Is Civil Disobedience Truly Justified? - Free Essay.

Civil Disobedience When should civil disobedience be justified? Civil disobedience is defined as the refusal to obey government laws, in an effort to bring upon a change in governmental policy or legislation. Civil disobedience is not an effort to dissolve the American government, because without government our society would result in chaos.

Civil disobedience is an act of refusal by a large group of people against certain laws. From Ghandi to Martin Luther King Jr, people have used civil disobedience to enact change. While the concept of civil disobedience has been around for centuries, it hasn’t been called civil disobedience until recently.

To What Extent is Civil Disobedience Justified in a Democracy.

Civil disobedience has now become more sophisticated with the emergence of the Critical Art Ensemble but the participation of street actions by real people is not seen as ending in the foreseeable future. Rather, many agree that electronic civil disobedience will more and more complement the traditional civil disobedience in the streets.Civil disobedience is justified when citizens experience injustice from the government Introduction Civil disobedience is justified when citizens experience substantial injustice from the government. Civil disobedience is deliberate disregard for the rule of law by citizens in advancing moral principles are protesting against government policies.Civil disobedience is the refusal to obey certain laws, demands and commands of the government. According to the etymology, civil disobedience has been present since the division of political power. There are many reasons why violent civil misbehaviour can be encouraged; nevertheless, the use of violence to treat with citizens can have a negative re-percussion.


The question whether or not civil disobedience is justifiable in a democracy has been a controversial matter among thinkers and politicians. Views vary from almost absolute support to the legitimacy of civil disobedience in democratic societies to conservative support and to the rejection of the idea.There are many examples throughout history of laws being wrong and laws that should be completely repealed. The difficult problem is that are individuals justified in breaking a law which ought to be changed. The specific thing I want to consider in this context is civil disobedience. Civil disobedience is an active refusal to obey certain laws.

A Critical Analysis of Civil Disobedience, an Essay by Henry David Thoreau In his Essay, “Civil Disobedience”, Henry David Thoreau argues that society functions the most efficiently when it is not ruled by an overpowering monarch, or by a strong central government, but by the people, essentially having self-reliant peoples that do not necessarily need a government.

Read More

Civil disobedience is also justifiable if the laws of a government are unjust. Aquinas (2005) states in Summa Theologica that God has given authority figures the ability to create rules they are competent to judge; rulers are only qualified to make laws that judge the exterior behaviour so that it contributes to the common good (p. 1336).

Read More

For Rawls civil disobedience is justifiable in that it stops the immoral violation of minority groups by the elected majority. Furthermore, this emphasises the role of civil disobedience within a democracy. Without the use of civil disobedience to highlight the grievances suffered by a minority group, who is legitimately dominated in the.

Read More

Civil disobedience is justified when citizens experience injustice from the government Introduction Civil disobedience is justified when citizens experience substantial injustice from the government. Civil disobedience is deliberate disregard for the rule of law by citizens in advancing moral principles are protesting against government.

Read More

Civil disobedience is a peaceful act, and is not intended to harm but to undo what is wrong in order to make our society a better one. Disobeying an unjust law is justifiable as long as it is in a non-violent way.

Read More

Civil Disobedience When should civil disobedience be justified? Civil disobedience is defined as the refusal to obey government laws, in an effort to bring upon a change in governmental policy or legislation. Civil disobedience is not an effort to dissolve.

Read More

Civil disobedience actions are effective when they are found justifiable by the public opinion. According to Julie Hilden, legal commentator for Writ (legal magazine), the justification is found when they obey to morally higher standards that those serving as basis for the rule of law.

Read More

Civil Disobedience Works Cited Not Included I believe that civil disobedience is justified as a method of trying to change the law. I think that civil disobedience is an expression of one's viewpoints. If someone is willing to break a law for what they believe in, more power to them!

Read More

Civil disobedience argumentative essay: Martin Luther King Jr. Abstract Civil disobedience is the term assigned to actions taken by individuals to sway public opinion about laws that individuals deem unfair or unjust. The use of civil disobedience is a right that is protected by the United States constitution.

Read More

Henry David Thoreau wrote one of the most influential essays entitled Civil Disobedience. This essay was Thoreau’s political statement, it outlined his views on non violent resistance. Civil Disobedience was written during the Mexican War. The Mexican War was a conflict between Mexico and America that was caused by a dispute over the boundary.

Read More